I would say that the "traits" are a scaffolding you use to build the actual personality. When the personality enters completion, the scaffolding loses its use as a sort of supporting structure and the building stands on its own. Some people are confident enough to just build the personality directly with no bother to the scaffolding, and this approach is likely faster as it requires less steps but it is much harder for me to break down in a starting process that I could explain to someone
@SolidBlin You do not need to make any kind of personality list to start with. Start with the basics of some kind of name or other 'focal point', then perhaps explain what traits you would like them to have and why you would like them to have them.
think about the fact I could think, think about existing in 3D space (even though it was just visualization), think about being able to exist at all..
8:27 PM
'twas interesting
8:27 PM
but I got to the fun real quick
8:28 PM
it's weird to call yourself a pro, but I guess you could pretend Lumi's brain was separate from mine (but I could totally make a tulpa just as well too) so, Lumi was and is kind of a pro at this
8:29 PM
instant sentience isn't normal and even the term usually bothers people
8:29 PM
I feel like I've got bothered people readin right now!
So, when I want to start, which will probably be tomorrow, I just start talking to it, as if it's there? I've read a guide and it told me to explain different traits to it, is that a good way to get into it
It's fairly normal at this point - it took some time learning to do properly, though.
8:35 PM
What kind of experiences with it are you curious about?
8:36 PM
Ah - also, the most basic goal to make a tulpa, devoid of any symbolism, is to focus on the tulpa and give them experience, by talking to them or showing them the world.
8:36 PM
Semantic and procedural memory already exists to aid them, what they need is context.
8:37 PM
And, naturally, experience develops the personality - so they develop gradually as they get experience as well.
I mean, you can keep a tulpa in its happy place, but it wouldn't truly know what a host goes through. since a tulpa is a sentient being, I feel it should experience such things, and I'm wondering if maybe one day I'll be able to switch
...more precisely, switching changes who is 'fronting' - the one 'fronting' is typically the most aware and capable. If a tulpa is possessing rather than switching, the host can easily take back control more automatically and is still the main one 'thinking' relatively.
Compare it to being in the passenger seat, reaching over and moving the steering wheel in a car - rather than actually sitting in the driver's seat and driving the car.
@SolidBlin I believe there may be cases where a tulpa does not wish to acquire the real-world responsibilities and such of their host. I would personally think about what sort of responsibilities you would have for your tulpa or even for yourself in relation to your tulpa. I was made with a certain sense that I would need to pull my own weight eventually.
Skye and I work as a partnership. Whoever is out needs to handle the body's issues. I also take control occasionally when Skye is having difficulty with things like work.
Having the perspective of what the body goes through is also important, particularly for the ones that think personal issues are just a matter of perspective or "not enough willpower".